🔗 Share this article

If some novelists have an imperial period, in which they achieve the heights consistently, then U.S. writer John Irving’s lasted through a sequence of several substantial, gratifying works, from his 1978 success His Garp Novel to the 1989 release A Prayer for Owen Meany. Those were expansive, humorous, warm novels, connecting protagonists he calls “misfits” to social issues from feminism to termination.

Following A Prayer for Owen Meany, it’s been diminishing results, aside from in size. His most recent book, the 2022 release His Last Chairlift Novel, was nine hundred pages of topics Irving had examined more effectively in prior works (inability to speak, short stature, gender identity), with a two-hundred-page screenplay in the heart to pad it out – as if padding were needed.

Therefore we come to a recent Irving with reservation but still a faint flame of hope, which burns stronger when we discover that Queen Esther – a only four hundred thirty-two pages – “returns to the universe of His Cider House Rules”. That 1985 novel is one of Irving’s top-tier books, located mostly in an institution in the town of St Cloud’s, managed by Dr Larch and his apprentice Homer.

The book is a failure from a writer who in the past gave such joy

In The Cider House Rules, Irving explored termination and identity with richness, comedy and an all-encompassing empathy. And it was a important novel because it moved past the themes that were turning into repetitive patterns in his novels: grappling, wild bears, Austrian capital, the oldest profession.

This book starts in the imaginary town of Penacook, New Hampshire in the early 20th century, where Mr. and Mrs. Winslow welcome 14-year-old ward Esther from St Cloud's home. We are a a number of years ahead of the storyline of Cider House, yet Dr Larch stays identifiable: even then using anesthetic, beloved by his staff, starting every speech with “At St Cloud's...” But his presence in this novel is limited to these early scenes.

The couple fret about parenting Esther well: she’s of Jewish faith, and “in what way could they help a young Jewish female find herself?” To address that, we move forward to Esther’s adulthood in the twenties era. She will be involved of the Jewish emigration to Palestine, where she will join the Haganah, the Jewish nationalist armed force whose “goal was to safeguard Jewish communities from opposition” and which would later form the basis of the Israel's military.

These are enormous themes to take on, but having presented them, Irving backs away. Because if it’s regrettable that the novel is not actually about the orphanage and the doctor, it’s all the more disheartening that it’s additionally not focused on the main character. For causes that must connect to story mechanics, Esther becomes a substitute parent for one more of the family's children, and bears to a male child, James, in World War II era – and the bulk of this novel is Jimmy’s narrative.

And now is where Irving’s fixations return strongly, both common and distinct. Jimmy relocates to – naturally – the Austrian capital; there’s talk of evading the Vietnam draft through self-harm (His Earlier Book); a dog with a significant title (the dog's name, meet the earlier dog from The Hotel New Hampshire); as well as the sport, streetwalkers, novelists and genitalia (Irving’s passim).

The character is a duller figure than the heroine promised to be, and the minor figures, such as students the pair, and Jimmy’s teacher Annelies Eissler, are flat too. There are several enjoyable scenes – Jimmy losing his virginity; a brawl where a few bullies get battered with a support and a air pump – but they’re brief.

Irving has not once been a delicate novelist, but that is isn't the difficulty. He has consistently reiterated his points, foreshadowed story twists and let them to gather in the reader’s mind before bringing them to completion in lengthy, jarring, entertaining sequences. For example, in Irving’s works, physical elements tend to disappear: remember the tongue in Garp, the hand part in Owen Meany. Those losses reverberate through the narrative. In Queen Esther, a major character is deprived of an limb – but we just discover thirty pages before the end.

She returns late in the story, but just with a last-minute sense of ending the story. We not once do find out the full narrative of her experiences in Palestine and Israel. Queen Esther is a letdown from a writer who once gave such joy. That’s the negative aspect. The positive note is that His Classic Novel – revisiting it together with this book – even now stands up excellently, after forty years. So read the earlier work in its place: it’s double the length as this book, but 12 times as enjoyable.